We do not simply install ERP. We analyse your processes, separate what the product covers as standard from what it does not, build the remainder using the platform’s own methods, and integrate it with the systems around it. We work in the AinosERP and CANIAS ecosystems and provide product-independent ERP consulting.
Let’s Discuss Your ERP Project → Pre-assessment tool ↗ ERP selection guide ↗
We do not accept one product as right for every business. We implement and develop in the two ecosystems below, and offer product-independent assessment and integration as a separate service.
A next-generation ERP built on a single data model, shipping with an AI agent (Sonia) and its own development language (NOS). We run implementation, customisation, integration and agent governance.
Our AinosERP capability ↗ Independent consultingAn enterprise ERP with strong manufacturing, MRP, logistics and finance coverage, deeply customisable through the TROIA development environment. We deliver module implementation, TROIA development, integration and version upgrades.
Our CANIAS capability ↗ Analysis, selection, transformationWe work without replacing your ERP too: process analysis, fit-gap, data migration, integration, reporting and performance work. If the right answer is not “replace your ERP”, we say so in writing.
ERP consulting ↗An ERP project is not the act of switching modules on; it is the act of building a company’s record structure. The topics below are what we genuinely put on the table in scoping sessions.
We build the record model around the production type: discrete, process, make-to-order and make-to-stock are not modelled the same way.
We do not impose a costing method; we design it around your accounting and production model. A cost report without variance analysis cannot be managed.
How many days period-end close takes is the most honest measure of how well the ERP was configured.
Inventory accuracy is not a reporting problem; it is a question of which record is posted at which moment on the floor.
Without one unbroken record chain from quote to collection, sales and finance will quote different numbers.
The hard part of integration is not making the connection; it is making sure a repeated request does not create a duplicate record and that every flow is traceable.
The chains below are the backbone of an ERP design. If one link runs outside the system, that is where reporting accuracy breaks.
Every step has an output. “The module went live” is not a deliverable; a deliverable is a testable document or a working flow.
Current workflow, data ownership, exceptions and systems are mapped. Scope is not written before we know who posts which record.
OutputProcess inventory and current-state document
Processes are split into what the standard covers, what configuration solves, what needs development and what integration closes.
OutputFit-gap matrix
Target flow, master data structure, authorisation model and approval steps are designed. Decisions here bind every later step.
OutputProcess design document and authorisation matrix
Standard capability is preserved where possible; the remainder is built with the platform’s supported methods and its rationale recorded.
OutputDevelopment list and customisation inventory
Master data, open transactions and historical movements are planned separately. A verification method is defined upfront for each data set.
OutputMigration plan and control totals
Real business scenarios are run with key users. The acceptance criterion is the clause in the scope document, not the screen opening.
OutputTest scenarios and acceptance records
The cutover method is chosen by project risk: pilot, phased, parallel run or controlled cutover. The rollback plan is written.
OutputGo-live checklist and rollback plan
The first period is monitored closely; open items and user feedback are queued. The key-user model reduces dependency.
OutputRole-based user training and open-item list
The software itself and the work we do are different things. The items below are what we take on, whichever product is chosen.
Mapping current flows, data ownership and exceptions department by department.
Putting the standard / configuration / development / integration split in writing.
Target flow, master data design, role and authorisation matrix.
Customisation using the platform’s supported methods, with the rationale recorded for each change.
Banking, e-documents, POS, e-commerce, WMS, MES and third-party service connections.
Separate migration and verification plans for master data, open transactions and history.
Key-user testing with real business scenarios and recorded acceptance.
Role-based training, key-user development, cutover checklist.
Close post-go-live monitoring, open-item tracking and regular maintenance.
Not sales pages but decision content: the guides below walk through the decisions that most often stall ERP projects.
TROIA makes it possible to customise inside the product. The real question is not whether the flexibility exists, but how a…
Read the guide ↗Customisation in AinosERP happens in three layers: screens with the visual designer, business rules in NOS, execution by the…
Read the guide ↗AinosERP is a domestic ERP platform that states it unifies all business processes in a single data model. What do the module…
Read the guide ↗CANIAS ERP has three layers: module groups, the TROIA development platform and iasDB. Where does that structure hold up, and which…
Read the guide ↗The outcome of an ERP project does not depend on the product alone. How to assess a consultancy’s process knowledge, governance…
Read the guide ↗The ERP ecosystem holds several defensible options; which one is right depends on scale, process depth and total cost. How to…
Read the guide ↗We implement and develop in the AinosERP and CANIAS ecosystems. Beyond that, whichever ERP you run, we can work product-independently on process analysis, integration, reporting and data migration.
Yes. A significant share of our work already runs on installed systems: you do not need to replace your ERP for process improvement, integration, development, reporting or performance work.
Duration depends on the number of companies and users, module scope, manufacturing complexity, the number of integrations, migration scope and development needs. A sound estimate therefore follows scope analysis. When you ask for a time commitment, make sure the scope is fixed too.
Licensing is only one line of the total. Infrastructure, analysis, configuration, development, integration, data cleansing and migration, testing, training, internal project time, go-live, hypercare, maintenance and version upgrades are separate lines. Use the pre-assessment tool to produce a line-item list for your own scope.
Undocumented development causes problems, not development itself. We record the rationale for every customisation, the standard object it affects and its upgrade impact; removing customisations that will not be carried forward makes the upgrade cheaper.
Not always. Master data, open transactions and historical movements are assessed separately. For some historical data, keeping it in an archive or reporting environment is a better answer than migrating it.
Let’s go through your current installation, your process map and the open items. The output of the first meeting is scope clarity, not a quote.
Technical discovery call
Leave your details and pick a day that suits you; we will come back to confirm. On the call we listen to your current system, the bottleneck and your goal. There is no charge for the first call.
Your request has been received.